Jung and Freud’s Theory of the Unconscious Essay

Jungs theory of the unconscious(p)(p)(p) mind(p) sprang from the influence of disassociationist psychology, whereby ideas and images lead to combine into complexes that represent a legal community of aces reputation. Thus, in his 1902 work, Jung theorized that the phenomenon called noctambulation might be an attempt of a future privateity to break through. In 1935, Jung posited the existence of the incarnate unconscious, which represents complexes that exist apart from peoples intentions (Astor, 2002).Freud placed besides much emphasis on the aspects of sexual and aggressive drives in his theory of the unconscious (Anzieu, 1986). On the other hand, Jung believed that the human unconscious is motivated by higher drives than these two, such(prenominal) as an inherent desire to render self-development and religious fulfillment. Moreover, Jung deviated from Freuds theory of the unconscious by positing that each person has a unique unconscious and that such unconscious may be accessed by a person voluntarily (Anzieu, 1986).Moreover, Jung carried his theory of the unconscious further by theorizing about the collective unconscious, which is composed of a universal spate of ideas that belong to the entire human race, which passed from one generation to the next. Thus, Jung believed that a persons personality is not that influenced by personal factors, but also by cultural influences that help build his personality (The new-made York Association for uninflected Psychology, 2008). Freud would live with treated Mary Jones through his action called psycho abridgment, or simply, the talking-cure. Freud believed that the psychological problems that appear to be Mary Jones manifestations could be solved by talking about them. Psycho abbreviation consists in the diligents narration of his thoughts and feelings to the therapist. Meanwhile, the therapist is supposed to listen carefully to the invitee, and from the clients narration fashion modelulate hi s analysis and help the client achieve well-nigh insight into the unresolved conflicts of the client, which are only embedded in the unconscious (Anzieu, 1986).On the other hand, since Jungian analysis aims to form a strong relationship mingled with the conscious and the unconscious, Jung would not confine the mould to a mere discussion of the patients thoughts and feelings. Jung believed that the unconscious is a fountainhead of psychic energy and healing thus, he would utilize images and symbols designed to spontaneously open up the patients fantasies and dreams. These images help in the exploration of new possibilities and achievement of personal transformation (The New York Association for Analytical Psychology, 2008).Jung places more emphasis n the offset that occurs during the therapy sessions, rather than the content of the therapy. Jungian analysis aims to help the patient achieve an discretion and awareness of the unconscious and thereby present relief to the patient s symptoms (The New York Association for Analytical Psychology, 2008). The differences in the intercession styles of Jung and Freud illustrate the following differences in their views of the unconscious